September 17, 2007

Wearing baggy Pants below the waste, Criminal or not?


It has been said that the road to hell was paved with good intentions. Our intent can sometime account for something but often it accounts for nothing more than seeking to lesson the impact of our actions. I think back to the crack epidemic that destroyed our communities all across this country from the early to mid 1980’s through the 1990’s. In an effort to stop drug dealers from practicing their genocidal hustle of selling crack cocaine in our communities we sought out police and judicial support in helping ensure that those who were caught selling this poison spent sometime in jail versus being arrested and right back on the streets a few days later selling crack again. So through protest and tirades this government was more than happy to come up with mandatory sentencing which sounded good and from the perspective of many of those who seen drug dealing as the root of many problems in our community, it was the answer to their prayers. To the credit of many of our conscious brothers and sisters they were opposed to these sentencing guidelines from the start, however their objections fell on deaf ears and in 1986 the evil one Ronald Regan signed into law one of the most egregious and racist laws enacted in the last 25 years. All of us are familiar with or should be familiar with “The Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986” that made being caught with 5 grams of crack (the drug of choice for black folk) a guaranteed five year sentence while it took 500 grams of powder cocaine (the drug of choice for white folk) to get the same sentence. Mind you, 500 grams of powder cocaine when cooked and turned into crack can make well over 80 packages of 5 grams of crack cocaine.

To understand why this law was enacted you have to understand what was happening across America during this time. Len Bias had recently died from drug use and the Democrats who controlled congress was being accused of being soft on crime thus they moved to prove they were not soft on crime at all by passing this legislation and of course we can not forget that Tip O’Neil the speaker of the house at the time was from Boston where Len Bias had recently been drafted to play. So in the mist of all of this and complaints from the Black community about rising murder and crime The Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 was passed without debate, without any experts being called in to testify, without the consultation of judges or the bureau of Prisons. The sentencing guidelines enacted by this law were sold as a way of going after the big drug traffickers but it was known that traffickers do not deal in such small amounts of drugs, further more traffickers did not traffic crack; they trafficked powder cocaine. Due mostly to these laws and other drug laws the incarcerations of Black folk in America increased from 288,800 in 1984 to 635,000 in 1994.

So today we are bombarded with reports and statistics that tells us one in three black males are some how involved in the justice system, be it in jail, on parole or simply Black in America. The lessons are clear and one would think we would be too smart and too sophisticated to make similar mistakes today by supporting laws, legislation and ideas that only seeks to inject more of our youth into the Criminals’ Criminal Justice System. Unfortunately I come today with bad news, we are not that smart, and we are not that sophisticated because we are buying into the lie that somehow baggy pants worn below the waste is criminal

The similarity in the hysteria surrounding the wearing of baggy pants below the waste is ominously similar to the hysteria surrounding drug use and selling in the 1980’s. The difference of course being that wearing baggy pants below the waste is not a violent act, but when you link it to rap music that degrades women, celebrate criminality, refer to black folk as niggers, promote no snitching and have very little redeeming qualities about it, you have the makings of hysteria that can convince the smartest amongst us that wearing of baggy pants below the waste is criminal and somehow speaks to the intelligence of our youth and by proxy links them to crime. Simply put, if your pants are hanging below your waste, you are more than likely to degrade women, call black folk niggers, celebrate criminality and promote no snitching which makes you a criminal worthy of being locked up; does that make sense to you? Me neither! However, it is believed apparently in some circles that the solution to the aforementioned pathologies is of course to have young men to pull their pants up and since they are unwilling to do it when asked, laws must be passed to protect the men and women in this great and decent society from these young men with saggy pants that on occasion shows their underwear.

We can not drop the ball on this issue nor can we sit passively by as laws are passed that seeks to inject more of our youth into the criminal justice system by criminalizing their style of dress. When the wearing of baggy pants below the waste can be reason enough to lock a young man up for 60 days and fine him five hundred dollars, I can say without question or contradiction, reason has been abandoned. If we fail to see that these laws are racist and that they will only lead to that stat about one and three to jump to two in three, then when the smoke clears blame will be placed and rightfully so, at our feet because we know better today and should be immune to white folk trickery and money making schemes to lock more of our youth up to support their stock marketed prison industrial complex.

12 Comments:

At 10:11 PM, Blogger HugoChavezWatch said...

Well the truth is in NC the average black male with baggy pants undsr 21 has an 8th grade intelligence...yea these are the same niggers that end up in jail..oh by the way 63 per cent of niggers in NC dont even graduate from high school...what an enlightened group of monkies

 
At 7:07 AM, Blogger Steve said...

How to make $5,000 ($10,000?) per hour,

24 hours per day
7 days per week
52 weeks per year

TAX Free?



Own the Ohio State Buckeyes Football team.


GooooBucks!!!

http://goooobucks.blogspot.com/

 
At 5:04 AM, Blogger Shazza Nakim said...

I've had this debate for a long time since way back in the early 1990's when the kids only wore them just low enough to show the lable on their Calvin Kliens.

My thing is .. if SAGGIN is part of a fad or fashion statement .. it has far out lived its stay. Over 10 years and the most evolution it got was having the pants fall as low as the knees?

If it is part of a PROTEST or MOVEMENT .. it needs to start kicking in. Either way, having a fair number of BLACK KIDS (because you know that is who will be targeted the most), then maybe the MOVEMENT will begin and the style will either be accepted or rejected officially JUST like the Women who fought to have the right to wear SPORTS BRAS in public.

Since the PARENT can not enforce Moral Law to get their kids to dress "functionally", then the Moral Law falls into the hands of Community Law. Again, if you haven't done nothing in over 10 years and the problem/issue get worst ... then by right LAWS are made, passed and now ENFORCED.

 
At 10:12 AM, Blogger Johanna said...

to the ignorant hugochavezwatch... that's not how you spell monkies you ignorant son of a bitch... get an education and then write down something that a 5 year old can spell

 
At 10:14 AM, Blogger Johanna said...

to the ignorant hugochavezwatch... you ignorant wetback/redneck/etc ... that is not how you spell monkies.. even a 5 year old knows that you dumbass

 
At 1:50 PM, Blogger JeSsIcA~NoeLLe said...

w0w hugochavezwatch.....you're talking about all these black guys who only have an "8th grade intelligence"...well thats better than the no intelligence you have. go back to english class, learn some correct grammar, and then talk about the less educated people in North Carolina. Because frankly, you are one of those people. LOSER.

[ and by the way....i like baggy pants on guys and we live in a free country...okay i get it maybe they shouldn't sag them to their knees like some of them do, but a little sag is kinda cute.=] they shouldn't make that a law. that would be absurd. ]

 
At 12:47 AM, Blogger Daniel Belby said...

This country (the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) is full of guys wearing their trousers like that... some of them are really hot emos, but anyway.

They're not criminals... but I suppose it's the hoody thing - more how they're perceived than what they are.

D. Belby,
DanielBelby@hotmail.co.uk

 
At 2:31 PM, Blogger Nicki said...

With your blog postings it seems like you should focus more on your relationship with God -your Creator. You're obviously upset at the world and your skin color. Seems kind of funny to put so much attention on the color. How about focusing more on our similarities as a human beings. How are we all similar. God says to love Him, love others, and to serve the world. The only time He spoke of "esteem" was to esteem others higher than yourself. Race and hatred came about from our sin -God didn't condone this. So your blog postings are not about black and white issues -they are about a hatred in your heart that is misguided. Focus on Him and work on your relationship with Him, not waisting your energy on hating a person because of the skin. The skin did not hurt someone or something -the action did. Again -not the skin (color), the ACTION. :)-thanks for reading!

 
At 4:27 PM, Blogger machan said...

Waste is not the same as waist.
Poor English grammar doesn't help your argument. The comparison is also not logical. What do drug laws have to do with lack of fashion? No one wants to see these people's underwear, whatever race they are. Making this a racist issue is just idiotic. If people want to sag, let them. They make idiots out of themselves without anyone's help, or laws, every time their pants fall down.

 
At 3:37 PM, Blogger Micki said...

Humm so I wonder if HugoChavez is Mexican maybe, possibly of Spanish decent? You are a perfect waste of US soil. So I guess you jumped the border to learn how to spell Monkey's? AYE!! Too bad. Maybe Rosetta Stone will help...you sweating hick, country as grease ball. Kill yaself BITCH!

 
At 5:53 AM, Blogger Shazza Nakim said...

It has been four years since this posting and looking back at the issues and the arguement ... nothing has changed or moved forward. If anything, it has moved backwards.

Now I ask, what is more criminal, the fact that the practices still occurs or the fact that communities still allow it?

I have tried to move the issue forward and got resistance about FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION and AMERICAN INDIVIDUALITY. People from the ACLU making speeches about protecting those who express themselves through Art and Fashion being like ART. The store selling the pants oversized and NOW undersized so that people can have "SWAGGA". Now the shorts are cut up in the front and worn on the thighs.

It's all Smoke and Mirrors. If your community doesn't like it (which polling will show that the majority don't like it) then make it CRIMINAL. But after almost two decades for SAGGIN' ... if you don't want to do anything about it ... SHUT THE &%#@$ UP and accept the ignorance you allow from your youth and now Adult communities.

 
At 8:04 AM, Blogger klimatyzacja said...

Klimatyzatory wentylacja coraz częściej ceny klimatyzacja stają się standardowym ceny klimatyzacja wyposażeniem naszych mieszkań i domów. Zapewne powodem klimatyzatory tego jest stopniowe ocieplanie się klimatu oraz coraz niższe, aczkolwiek niemałe, ceny klimatyzator tych urządzeń. Dodatkowym powodem klimatyzatory rozpowszechnienia klimatyzacja się klimatyzatorów jest chęć pracy oraz wypoczynku w coraz klimatyzacja lepszych warunkach. Jaki klimatyzacja klimatyzator wybrać w naszym przypadku? Ten artykuł pomoże Ci odpowiedzieć sobie na to pytanie.
Jaka klimatyzacja klimatyzacja.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Black Sites and Forums