March 08, 2006

Future wars will be about European survival...

For some people it is hard for them to fathom white folk carrying out an act or taking a particular position because it is about their survival more than it is about the issue itself. One such issue that comes to mind is abortion, most people are under the impression that white folk anti-abortion stances is about their religious beliefs because they cover their arguments and oppositional stances in religious dogma, but what white folk fear more than anything is global annihilation and or marginalization.

The Wall Street Journal ran a piece entitled “Babies Win Wars” (posted on a forum) wherein the author spoke to the reality that white folk are dying out all over the world, they are being overtaken by the genetic, cultural and religious strength of other people. The author begins his piece by noting that dying nations are defined by nations having a 1.5 or lower fertility rate and by using that definition 30 European nations are dying. We must understand this is not simply an informational piece this is a call to arms, an attempt at awakening white folk to the world that they will be facing in 15 to 20 years. The author writes;

“In 2020, there will be one billion "fighting-age" men (ages 15-29) world-wide; only 65 million will be Europeans. At the same time, the Muslim world will have 300 million males, often with limited opportunities at home.”

How important is this fact? What does it mean to white supremacy? and to what extent will the contemporary guards of white supremacy go to maintain white supremacy? What will be the number of African fighting age males in 2020, and why specifically mentioned the number of Muslims males there will be? is Islam or Muslims the biggest threat to white supremacy or the biggest threat to the next form of world oppression that will replace white supremacy? Make no mistake about it, I am a Muslim but I am well aware of Arab belief in their superiority over the African and I am well aware of African men and women in Africa no less, who self identifying as Arab when everything about them is phenotypically African. Also what’s the importance of mentioning their will be limited opportunities at home? Is it to say these 300 million Muslim men will not be staying put in their Muslims nations?

The Original Population Bomb.

If history is our best teacher than it is about time we start paying attention to what is being spoken about in closed sessions and why Michael Savage is constantly beating the drum of “Borders, Language and Culture”. While it may be tough to get someone like Michael Savage to admit it; his fight for “Borders, Language and Culture is directly related to the decline in European births and the real possibility of a global marginalization of the European.

In the aforementioned article the author writes about the defeats Europe suffered “after 1945 from Indochina to Algeria to Timor “. He states these defeats have been referred to euphemistically as “the emancipation of the colonies” but the real reason he states these defeats were possible was because of the decline in European birth rates, he then boldly states that;

“If Europeans had continued to multiply like in its imperialistic prime, the world would still tremble before their armies.”

He then makes it clear as to what he is arguing when he writes;

“if Europe had merely matched the fourfold increase of the United States (to 300 million from 75 million between 1900-2006), the continent's 1.6 billion would still dwarf China (1.3 billion) and India (1.1 billion). Yet, Europe's share of the world's fighting-age males, which stood at 27% in 1914, is lower today (9%) than it was in 1500 (11%). Thus, the new clothes of European "pacifism" and "soft power" conceal its naked weakness.”

Make no mistake about it, the European is afraid of becoming a minority in respect to power and influence around the world, the European understands that the worlds darker people have not forgotten about its Imperialistic past, and while it may not be as transparent today as it will be tomorrow, the European is worried about his survival and he will fight to no end to survive even if it means nuclear war.

Lastly, the author basically hopes for the fall of Europe so that its brightest and bravest men can flee Europe in a panic to the U.S. thus strengthening it economically and militarily, he writes;

“With a fertility rate at the 2.1 replacement level, the U.S. is still defendable. But how many times can America send out their only sons to prevent all those second, third or fourth sons from engaging in acts of violence abroad? In some ways, the faster Europe collapses the better it will be for the U.S., whose chances of defeating global terrorism would improve by a panic-driven influx of the Old World's best, brightest and bravest ready to strengthen it economically and militarily.”

All wars in the coming years will not be about capital as they have been in the past, many of them will be about European survival in a world where they are slowly becoming a minority in regards to world power and influence and they can not fathom living in a world like that and they will do everything in their power to prolong such from happening.


At 3:32 PM, Blogger Cynthia said...

I just read one report that said Europe's population will decline as much as 90 million by 2050. Most of the reports said 70 million. Either way, they are in trouble. If it declines by 90 million, that means they are losing 2 million people per year since the year 2000. These numbers are staggering since everyone else's population is expected to increase.

I just wanted to say the Arabs have a problem too. They inbreed too much. They are encountering all types of serious mutations/birth defects. The more you inbreed, the weaker your offspring will be. Unless they stop, this will be their undoing. In my Genetic class, they are already being talked about.

At 11:57 AM, Blogger Intellectual Insurgent said...

Great post!

This explains why the EU can't make up its mind about whether to let Turkey join. They need the cheap labor, but they don't want the "savages" from the east coming into their countries.

About a year ago, racist Australia become concerned about underpopulation and, instead of increasing immigration, the government paid $2500 to couples to reproduce. That's no different than the white-only immigration policy it had for decades.

Four states in America have lost their white majority, which is why "illegal" immigration is becoming a pathological obsession.

An Iranian guy I met a few days ago told me that when Khomenei came to power, he told the people there would be a big war 25 years in the future and encouraged the people to start making babies who would be old enough to defend the nation by the time the war rolled around.

At 1:57 PM, Blogger Family Griot said...

Faheem, this is unfortunately a subject lost to many. If you notice there are more white males who are against abortion than any other group. Secondly, there are white leaders like Pat Robertson and Pat Buchanan who have extensively written and discussed this topic. Pat Buchanan has a book about it called "The Death of the West".
There are several European countries who are encouraging their people to have children. Years ago Norway who have been on the forefront of this decline in population are paying mothers to stay at home and have children. In other countries like Germany they are doing the same thing.
This seems like an issue that the majority of white people worldwide are united on. But what goes around comes around....

At 1:59 AM, Blogger Daniel Belby said...

It'll be a good thing when the white race dies out.

D. Belby,


Post a Comment

<< Home

Black Sites and Forums